From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753905AbYE3W4r (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 18:56:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754429AbYE3W41 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 18:56:27 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40535 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754206AbYE3W40 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 18:56:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 15:55:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Arjan van de Ven cc: Hugh Dickins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Greg KH , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of May 30th 2008 In-Reply-To: <484080EC.9090707@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <48402DAA.60202@linux.intel.com> <48407909.5090608@linux.intel.com> <484080EC.9090707@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 May 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > versions that do identify themselves as "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686.PAE", and > these ones didn't, (they're all in the "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686" form) so > this is a kernel without PAE. Hmm. Every single one is that one kernel version or 2.6.25.3-18.fc9.i686, and with that many reports I'd have expected it from other kernels too. What was the previous popular fc9 kernel (I assume it was 2.6.25-based too?), and what changed? Linus