From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760039AbYFDKt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:49:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754082AbYFDKtU (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:49:20 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:55961 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752983AbYFDKtT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:49:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:48:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, andi@firstfloor.org Subject: Re: aperture_64.c: corner case wrong In-Reply-To: <20080604104438.GA5522@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20080526191730.GA18425@elf.ucw.cz> <20080602153033.2d1672f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080604104438.GA5522@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > So what happened with this? Thomas has merged an "x86: > > > aperture_64.c: cleanups" from yourself but it appears that half of > > > this bugfix got applied somewhere and the below part did not? > > > > Err, no. I seem to have dropped the patch completely. I'm picking it > > up again. > > no, it was not dropped (we dont drop patches :), here are all the > arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c patches in -tip: > > earth4:~/tip> tip-log arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c | grep ^# > # x86/gart: 1edc1ab: x86: agp_gart size checking for buggy device > # x86/gart: 8c9fd91: x86: checking aperture size order > # x86/gart: 7677b2e: x86_64: allocate gart aperture from 512M > # x86/gart: 55c0d72: x86: clean up aperture_64.c > # x86/gart: 0abbc78: x86, aperture_64: use symbolic constants > # x86/gart: dd564d0: x86: aperture_64.c: cleanups > > so it's commit dd564d0 - but that second chunk Andrew noticed indeed > went missing in action. No, the patch was titled: ".... - corner case wrong" its missing and I'm wondering why. /me digs into git branches Thanks, tglx