From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755533AbYFKIVu (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:21:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752943AbYFKIVi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:21:38 -0400 Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net ([206.46.252.42]:40877 "EHLO vms042pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752102AbYFKIVh (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:21:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:21:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -mm 2/2] kexec jump -v11: save/restore device state In-reply-to: <1213146074.21923.10.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> X-X-Sender: lenb@localhost.localdomain To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Pavel Machek , nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Vivek Goyal , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Kexec Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII References: <1213082106.22608.30.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <1213146074.21923.10.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Huang, Ying wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:01 -0400, Len Brown wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Huang, Ying wrote: > > > > > This patch implements devices state save/restore before after kexec. > > > > > > > > > This patch together with features in kexec_jump patch can be used for > > > following: > > > > > > - A simple hibernation implementation without ACPI support. You can > > > kexec a hibernating kernel, save the memory image of original system > > > and shutdown the system. When resuming, you restore the memory image > > > of original system via ordinary kexec load then jump back. > > > > What part of ACPI's role in hibernation are you trying to avoid > > 1. enabling wake devices > > 2. removing power from the system > > 3. something else? > > ACPI S5 is used instead of S4 for this simple hibernation > implementation. That is, before creating the hibernation image, the ACPI > _PTS is not executed, devices are not put into low power state and wake > devices are not enabled. After creating the hibernation image, the image > is saved to disk and system is shutdown (go to S5). When resuming from > hibernated image, ACPI _BFS and _WAK are not executed too. Doesn't that resume the devices and their drivers into an unknown state? -Len