From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754559AbYFRPat (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:30:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752677AbYFRPaj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:30:39 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:46667 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752559AbYFRPah (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:30:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:29:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar , ACPI Devel Maling List , Len Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325 In-Reply-To: <200806181640.45595.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: References: <20080613232214.394fd6fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200806181640.45595.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I just checked that the original c1e series and the affected code in > > tip are not different. IIRC you confirmed that the C1E patches would > > work on your box. So I wonder what else got changed which causes these > > problems. > > Well, to eliminate any possible correlations, do you have a version of the > series or a single patch against the current mainline? http://userweb.kernel.org/~tglx/952f4a-c1e-apic.patch http://userweb.kernel.org/~tglx/952f4a-c1e.patch c1e-apic is the forward port of the apic changes and c1e is the pure c1e stuff. On my box it does not work w/o the c1e-apic one, but .... Thanks, tglx