From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755480AbYFRV6j (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:58:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754062AbYFRV6b (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:58:31 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:46496 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754090AbYFRV6a (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:58:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:58:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Pavel Machek , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Arjan van de Veen , Andreas Herrmann Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] x86: add c1e aware idle function In-Reply-To: <200806182226.07590.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-ID: References: <20080610171639.551369443@linutronix.de> <20080610171712.465591661@linutronix.de> <20080618192148.GA4243@ucw.cz> <200806182226.07590.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 18 of June 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Thu 2008-06-12 10:29:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > C1E on AMD machines is like C3 but without control from the OS. Up to > > > now we disabled the local apic timer for those machines as it stops > > > when the CPU goes into C1E. This excludes those machines from high > > > resolution timers / dynamic ticks, which hurts especially the X2 based > > > laptops. > > > > > > The current boot time C1E detection has another more serious flaw: > > > some BIOSes do not enable C1E until the ACPI processor module is > > > loaded. This causes systems to stop working after that point. > > > > > > To work nicely with C1E enabled machines we use a separate idle > > > function, which checks on idle entry whether C1E was enabled in the > > > Interrupt Pending Message MSR. This allows us to do timer broadcasting > > > > Entering idle is quite a common operation, and reading MSR is quite > > slow. Is it possible to do better here? > > > > What happens if ACPI BIOS toggles MSR on all cpus *while* we are > > entering idle? This seems inherently racy... Well, on most of the machines we see the C1E bit on the first idle entry either on CPU0 or on CPU1. I know of exactly one machine which has the C1E thing enabled late when the ACPI stuff runs. > Yes, and that fits the picture I'm observing on the nx6325 (see the > "linux-next: Tree for June 13: IO APIC breakage on HP nx6325" thread). Hmm, when is the C1E detected on current mainline ? Does the boot CPU have it or is it when the second CPU comes up ? Thanks, tglx