From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1764001AbYGOV05@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1764001AbYGOV05 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:26:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763762AbYGOV0f
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:26:35 -0400
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46037 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763738AbYGOV0e (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:26:34 -0400
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: pageexec@freemail.hu
cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Linux 2.6.25.10
In-Reply-To: <487D3056.1183.1C0E1C47@pageexec.freemail.hu>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807151425170.2867@woody.linux-foundation.org>
References: <20080703185727.GA12617@suse.de>, <487D2371.10258.1BDBBC00@pageexec.freemail.hu>, <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807151331110.2867@woody.linux-foundation.org> <487D3056.1183.1C0E1C47@pageexec.freemail.hu>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, pageexec@freemail.hu wrote:
> 
> and how is that different from today's situation where they aren't told
> at all?

Umm. They are. They are told to upgrade to the stable kernel, which 
should have everything we know about.

I'm just saying that why mark things, when the marking have no meaning? 
People who believe in them are just _wrong_.

		Linus