From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@tglx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] select: add a timespec version of the timeout to select/poll
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:54:35 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808291954120.3300@nehalem.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080829191032.077ca1c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> It could be that two plain old writes is more efficient. (and it could
> be that this is how the compiler implements the memset anyway?)
gcc indeed knows about memset(), and will generate just two stores. No
worries,
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-30 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-29 15:05 [patch 0/5] Nano/Microsecond resolution for select() and poll() Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] select: add a timespec version of the timeout to select/poll Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-30 2:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-30 2:54 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-08-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] select: return accurate remainer in select() and ppoll() Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] select: introduce a schedule_hrtimeout() function Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout() Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-29 15:59 ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-29 16:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-29 16:11 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-29 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-29 17:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 18:18 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-29 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-29 18:33 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-30 15:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 16:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] select: make poll() use schedule_hrtimeout() as well Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:54 ` [patch 0/5] Nano/Microsecond resolution for select() and poll() Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-29 16:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 22:15 ` Brian Wellington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0808291954120.3300@nehalem.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@tglx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®