From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752718AbYIAWd4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:33:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750709AbYIAWds (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:33:48 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:55157 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751235AbYIAWdr (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:33:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 00:33:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Linus Torvalds cc: Larry Finger , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alok Kataria , Michael Buesch Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <48BB2116.1060904@lwfinger.net> <48BC2A03.9000104@lwfinger.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > The CPU calibration of < 2.6.27 is against PIT and does _NOT_ give me a > > pretty good estimation for TSC. > > Umm. Which one. The 32-bit or the 64-bit? The 32 bit version. tglx