From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754822AbYIFUaT (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 16:30:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752492AbYIFUaH (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 16:30:07 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56679 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752477AbYIFUaG (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Sep 2008 16:30:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Thomas Gleixner cc: Alok Kataria , Alan Cox , LKML , Arjan van de Veen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Dan Hecht , Garrett Smith Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20080904160036.GA18382@elte.hu> <20080904190728.59634020@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20080904204305.GA29065@elte.hu> <20080904205236.GA3864@elte.hu> <20080904213350.GA15678@elte.hu> <1220653095.14401.72.camel@alok-dev1> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Adding another check after the second get_cycles() makes it reliable: My original patch actually had that, and Ingo added it to the -tip tree too (I think), so that should be the one we're discussing anyway. I just didn't think it would ever trigger in practice, which is why I removed it. Mea culpa. Linus