From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apci: dump slit
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:44:32 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809122323050.13819@apollo.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y71xqd1x.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On the other hand there's quite some other information dumped
> at boot that could be cut out. e.g. It doesn't really make
> much sense to dump the cache information of each CPU at boot
> when that information can easily be gotten from user space
> later.
You're assuming that you ever reach user space, which is a pretty dumb
assumption.
I prefer to have a detailed view of the machine when I have to look at
a bug report where the machine does _NOT_ reach user space.
> I personally was also always sceptical of some of the
> more detailed new memory map dumping, like those "nosave
> memory" or the early reservation/early node/add_active_range output.
> It's pretty much a direct function of the e820 map dumped earlier.
> Also node information has now the dubious distinction to be
> the most redundantly dumped kernel information of all.
Bla, bla, bla.
This code was reworked significantly and every information which is
given about the various decisions made are useful to debug problems. I
prefer a more noisy startup over some silent fuckup when a problem
hits.
We had enough trouble to decode silent "fixups" which failed
miserably.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-12 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-12 18:17 Yinghai Lu
2008-09-12 19:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-12 19:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-12 20:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-09-12 21:17 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-12 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2008-09-12 21:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-12 21:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-12 21:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-12 21:41 ` Matt Keenan
2008-09-12 21:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-12 22:14 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-12 21:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-12 22:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-14 11:22 ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-14 12:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 15:59 ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-14 16:00 ` Pavel Machek
2008-09-14 16:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-14 18:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-18 18:26 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0809122323050.13819@apollo.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®