From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751894AbYIWKvk (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:51:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751121AbYIWKvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:51:31 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:57174 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750959AbYIWKva (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:51:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:50:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Cyrill Gorcunov , Ingo Molnar , Joshua Hoblitt Subject: Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? In-Reply-To: <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.zJH.p0q1IB@albercik> Message-ID: References: <7lIhZC4hCxE.A.zJH.p0q1IB@albercik> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543 > Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug alive to chase the other issues. Thanks, tglx