From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753632AbYI1Uuy (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752206AbYI1Uuq (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:46 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:49049 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752130AbYI1Uuq (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:50:46 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 13:50:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Al Viro cc: Alexey Dobriyan , ebiederm@xmission.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc7-sha1: EIP at proc_sys_compare+0x36/0x50 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20080926152031.GA30831@x200.localdomain> <20080928141856.GG28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I dunno. Do we want to move the D_UNHASHED check up earlier? Or am I still > missing something? Oh, it's not D_UNHASHED, it's DCACHE_UNHASHED. Whatever. The patch still looks fine, I had just forgotten the naming of the d_flags fields. Linus