From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937703AbZAPV0w (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:26:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764641AbZAPV0k (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:26:40 -0500 Received: from ftp.linux-mips.org ([213.58.128.207]:41282 "EHLO ftp.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764570AbZAPV0j (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:26:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:26:38 +0000 (GMT) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Jan Beulich cc: Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid early crash in disable_local_APIC() In-Reply-To: <497051E7.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Message-ID: References: <496DE893.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <20090115110528.GE16253@elte.hu> <20090115224710.GA1327@elte.hu> <20090115224751.GA1625@elte.hu> <497051E7.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Jan Beulich wrote: > Is this with a config that has X86_IO_APIC off (i.e. one the practical use of > which I never understood, and hence easily forget to consider)? Otherwise > I can't see how that could happen. A lot of systems have a P6-class CPU which has a local APIC and no I/O APIC in the chipset. My old laptop was an example of one. It saves some memory to have X86_IO_APIC disabled on such systems, while still being able to use the local APIC for the NMI watchdog and PeMo. Maciej