From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753275AbYLAQgu (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:36:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751370AbYLAQgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:36:40 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:53633 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751183AbYLAQgj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:36:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:36:18 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: David Miller cc: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [please, revert] Re: [PATCH 11/32] of_platform_driver noise on sparce In-Reply-To: <20081130.231354.204449660.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <20081126.010541.158438052.davem@davemloft.net> <20081130212329.GF28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20081130.231354.204449660.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, David Miller wrote: > > It looks like all of your patches got applied regardless of > what followups they received. > > I'll chalk this up to a simple oversight given that Linus just > got back from a week of vacation :) Yes. But also to me simply being pretty much conditioned to applying Al's patches regardless (they often cross maintainer boundaries, and they are almost always correct). So even in the absense of vacation, it probably would have happened. But it's reverted now. Linus