mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Tim Blechmann <tim@klingt.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	oprofile-list@lists.sf.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:10:23 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901141739580.3598@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230894257.6072.10.camel@thinkpad>

Tim,

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Tim Blechmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-26 at 03:42 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Tim Blechmann wrote:
> > >> i am experiencing an issue, similar to the one reported in
> > >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/30/319.
> > > 
> > > bisecting showed, that commit b99170288421c79f0c2efa8b33e26e65f4bb7fb8
> > > (oprofile: Implement Intel architectural perfmon support) caused the
> > > problem. 
> > > oddly, the newly introduced api is not used, since the model struct is
> > > set during the ppro_init call ...
> > 
> > We're still investigating the problem. Thanks for the report.
> 
> btw, this issue still exists in tip/oprofile ... not sure, whether this
> may be related, but i am running the machine in 64-bit mode ...

can you please apply the patch below and provide the output ?

That's one of the subtle differences to the 2.6.27 code, where the
counter width is fixed to 32bit, which is correct anyway as the
counter MSRs can only write the lower 32bits and sign extend bit 31
according to intel documentation.

There are more subtle changes, but this is the most obvious one.

Thanks,

	tglx
---
 arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_ms
 		eax.full = cpuid_eax(0xa);
 		if (counter_width < eax.split.bit_width)
 			counter_width = eax.split.bit_width;
+
+		printk(KERN_INFO "ppro counter_width: %d\n", counter_width);
 	}
 
 	/* clear all counters */

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-14 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-21 14:23 Tim Blechmann
2008-12-21 21:23 ` Tim Blechmann
2008-12-22 12:11   ` Robert Richter
2008-12-26  2:42   ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-02 11:04     ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-14 17:10       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-01-14 18:19         ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-15  8:46           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-15  9:14             ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-15 20:37               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-16  0:53                 ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-16  8:59                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-16 11:29                     ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-16 15:52                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-01-16 16:02                         ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-17 13:32                     ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-17 14:14                       ` Robert Richter
2009-01-17 15:09                         ` Tim Blechmann
2009-01-17 15:56                           ` Robert Richter
2009-01-17 16:40                             ` Tim Blechmann
2009-02-11 19:51 ` 2.6.29-rc4 regression (was: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression) Tim Blechmann
2009-02-13 19:07   ` Robert Richter
2009-02-16 10:23     ` Tim Blechmann
2009-02-16 11:33       ` Robert Richter
2009-02-16 12:53         ` 2.6.29-rc4 regression Tim Blechmann
2009-02-17  7:45           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-17 21:56             ` Tim Blechmann
2009-02-18  4:54               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-16 11:40       ` 2.6.29-rc4 regression (was: Re: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression) Robert Richter
2009-02-19 16:34         ` [PATCH] oprofile: don't set counter width from cpuid on core2 Tim Blechmann
2009-03-03 10:04           ` Robert Richter
2009-03-03 11:05             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 11:09             ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: oprofile: don't set counter width from cpuid on Core2 Tim Blechmann
2008-12-22 14:55 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression Tim Blechmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0901141739580.3598@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=tim@klingt.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®