From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753162AbZBCD0O (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:26:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751384AbZBCDZ4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:25:56 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56565 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751312AbZBCDZz (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:25:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:25:42 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Jesse Barnes cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PCI , pm list , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] PCI PM: More refinements of suspend-resume framework In-Reply-To: <200902021032.26819.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Message-ID: References: <200902012229.27517.rjw@sisk.pl> <200902021032.26819.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > The last patch makes the warning in pci_legacy_suspend() more useful. > > Linus, do you want these as part of the next pull request? If so, I'll check > them out, pull them in, and let them run the linux-next build gauntlet for a > day before sending them. Otherwise I'll just send a pull request today with > the 8 or so fixes I have queued now. I want them eventually, but I don't know if we got confirmation that this particular series actually fixed the PCI-E bridge issue? The one that Parag reported.. It would be good to have confirmation. Maybe we do already and I missed that email? Linus