From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755226AbZBCVNR (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:13:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752117AbZBCVND (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:13:03 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:47600 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750866AbZBCVNB (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:13:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:12:04 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" , Jesse Barnes , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andreas Schwab , Len Brown , Russell King Subject: Re: Reworking suspend-resume sequence (was: Re: PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early) In-Reply-To: <20090203210442.GA27804@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <200902031804.26752.rjw@sisk.pl> <200902031032.26771.jesse.barnes@intel.com> <20090203191334.GA2797@elte.hu> <20090203195304.GA31049@elte.hu> <20090203205727.GA4460@elte.hu> <20090203210442.GA27804@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > So i'd still like your tentative Signed-off-by for your patch - it's i think > not v2.6.29 material but if it stays problem free in testing we can try it > in v2.6.30. If it causes problem it will be clearly bisectable and clearly > revertable. > > Maybe we could split it in two: and for MSI we could introduce a 'simpler > and faster' edge flow as well - and keep the legacy handler untouched. That > way it's low-risk in its entirety. (and avoids the MSI ->mask complication > as well.) Yes, seperating out the MSI handler into it's own flow control is the right way to go. We had trouble with real edge hardware and IIRC most of the problems originated from ARM. rmk ?? Thanks, tglx