From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
shai@scalex86.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: don't compile vsmp_64 for 32bit
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:36:11 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903260034200.3397@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090325232921.GL7278@localdomain>
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> > Sure, but it would be cleaner if the whole file were controlled by
> > CONFIG_X86_VSMP. is_vsmp_box() is already defined as const inline
> > returning 0 if !CONFIG_X86_VSMP.
> >
>
> The point in this thread was, is_vsmp_box() needs to be meaningful even when
> CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not on. This is needed because is_vsmp_box() is used to
> determine if the platform has reliable tscs.
Did you even read what Jeremy wrote or bother to look at the code in
arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h ?
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_VSMP
extern int is_vsmp_box(void);
#else
static inline int is_vsmp_box(void)
{
return 0;
}
#endif
So the .c file is completely useless if CONFIG_X86_VSMP=n.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 5:20 Yinghai Lu
2009-02-26 5:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-26 6:48 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-02-26 8:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-02-26 11:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-27 0:17 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-02-28 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-02 23:51 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-03 0:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-03-22 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-24 6:14 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-24 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 18:51 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-25 22:16 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-25 22:36 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-25 23:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-25 23:29 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-25 23:36 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-03-26 0:11 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-25 23:58 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-26 0:31 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-26 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-26 18:17 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2009-03-26 7:57 ` [tip:x86/apic] Revert "x86: don't compile vsmp_64 for 32bit" Ravikiran G Thirumalai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0903260034200.3397@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®