From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935973AbZDCTUu (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:20:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934553AbZDCTUe (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:20:34 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:39249 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936021AbZDCTUd (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:20:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:17:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Mark Fasheh cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, Joel Becker , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [git patches] Ocfs2 updates for 2.6.30 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20090403184605.GC14571@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Are they likely? Probably not. But that's not the point. The point is that > you barely had time to compile that thing, much less give it any testing. Gaah. I pulled it anyway. Today, I just can't find it in me to care about ocfs2 testing. But please - keep this in mind. Even if the commit is old, when you rebase it, you really do move it into a whole new world order. And yes, it _usually_ works just fine. But to make sure, please do spend some time after setting up the tree to make sure that what I get really is something that you know is what I want to get. Linus