From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>
Cc: Hua Zhong <hzhong@gmail.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:10:45 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904061604410.8214@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904061509020.7443@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> thing that we think people would be happiest with.
>
> I think "ordered" was a reasonable default, but that was at least partly
> because _both_ ordered and writeback sucked (partly in different ways).
>
> I do think we could make it a config option.
A patch _something_ like this.
A few notes:
- This is UNTESTED (of course)
- If I did this right, this _only_ overrides the data mode if it's not
explicitly specified on disk in the superblock mount options.
IOW, if you have done a
tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered
then this will _not_ override that. Only in the absense of any explicit
flags should this trigger and then make the choice be 'writeback'.
And just to be _extra_ backwards compatible, if you really want the old
behavior, and don't want to set the ordering flag explicitly, just answer
'y' to the EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED Kconfig question.
What do people think? Anybody want to test?
Linus
---
fs/ext3/Kconfig | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
fs/ext3/super.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/Kconfig b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
index 8e0cfe4..fb3c1a2 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ext3/Kconfig
@@ -28,6 +28,25 @@ config EXT3_FS
To compile this file system support as a module, choose M here: the
module will be called ext3.
+config EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
+ bool "Default to 'data=ordered' in ext3 (legacy option)"
+ depends on EXT3_FS
+ help
+ If a filesystem does not explicitly specify a data ordering
+ mode, and the journal capability allowed it, ext3 used to
+ historically default to 'data=ordered'.
+
+ That was a rather unfortunate choice, because it leads to all
+ kinds of latency problems, and the 'data=writeback' mode is more
+ appropriate these days.
+
+ You should probably always answer 'n' here, and if you really
+ want to use 'data=ordered' mode, set it in the filesystem itself
+ with 'tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered'.
+
+ But if you really want to enable the legacy default, you can do
+ so by answering 'y' to this question.
+
config EXT3_FS_XATTR
bool "Ext3 extended attributes"
depends on EXT3_FS
diff --git a/fs/ext3/super.c b/fs/ext3/super.c
index 9e5b8e3..599dbfe 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/super.c
@@ -44,6 +44,12 @@
#include "acl.h"
#include "namei.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_EXT3_DEFAULTS_TO_ORDERED
+ #define EXT3_MOUNT_DEFAULT_DATA_MODE EXT3_MOUNT_ORDERED_DATA
+#else
+ #define EXT3_MOUNT_DEFAULT_DATA_MODE EXT3_MOUNT_WRITEBACK_DATA
+#endif
+
static int ext3_load_journal(struct super_block *, struct ext3_super_block *,
unsigned long journal_devnum);
static int ext3_create_journal(struct super_block *, struct ext3_super_block *,
@@ -1919,7 +1925,7 @@ static int ext3_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
cope, else JOURNAL_DATA */
if (journal_check_available_features
(sbi->s_journal, 0, 0, JFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_REVOKE))
- set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, ORDERED_DATA);
+ set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, DEFAULT_DATA_MODE);
else
set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, JOURNAL_DATA);
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-06 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 12:48 Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: change the request allocation/congestion logic to be sync/async based Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] Add WRITE_SYNC_PLUG and SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: fsync_buffers_list() should use SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] jbd: use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG instead of WRITE_SYNC Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] jbd2: " Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: enabling plugging on SSD devices that don't do queuing Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] block: Add flag for telling the IO schedulers NOT to anticipate more IO Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] block: switch sync_dirty_buffer() over to WRITE_SYNC Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 13:13 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 16:57 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07 3:28 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-06 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 15:10 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 17:01 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 18:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-06 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 21:26 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-06 20:12 ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 20:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 21:19 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-06 21:35 ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 22:04 ` Ray Lee
2009-04-06 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-04-07 7:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-07 10:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 14:10 ` Diego Calleja
2009-04-08 12:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 12:56 ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-04-08 13:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 13:35 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-07 14:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-07 19:24 ` Mark Lord
2009-04-07 19:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-07 20:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-04-09 2:40 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-09 14:01 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-04-06 22:25 ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 22:48 ` Ray Lee
2009-04-06 22:52 ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 23:19 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-07 3:52 ` Chris Mason
2009-04-07 4:13 ` Trenton D. Adams
2009-04-07 4:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-07 4:48 ` Trenton D. Adams
2009-04-07 5:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-07 5:23 ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-07 6:27 ` Trenton D. Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0904061604410.8214@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hzhong@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®