From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: npiggin@suse.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SLQB: Use _RET_IP_ instead of __builtin_return_address(0)
Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:22:01 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905030821290.7144@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905030816050.7072@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>
> > From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
> >
> > This patch changes SLQB to use the shorter _RET_IP_ form for consistency
> > with SLUB and to prepare SQLB for eventual kmemtrace hooks.
>
> ... big snip ...
>
> > void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t gfpflags)
> > {
> > - return __kmem_cache_alloc(s, gfpflags, __builtin_return_address(0));
> > + return __kmem_cache_alloc(s, gfpflags, _RET_IP_);
> > }
>
> since i originally pointed out this possible simplification, i might
> as well also point out that the above is not necessarily correct. in
> include/linux/kernel.h:
>
> #define _RET_IP_ (unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0)
>
> as in, _RET_IP_ represents the **(unsigned long)** cast of that
> (void*) value. so, technically, that's not merely an aesthetic
> replacement. is that still what you wanted?
whoops, never mind, i didn't read far enough to notice you were
making that change throughout the code. carry on.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-03 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-03 12:14 Pekka J Enberg
2009-05-03 12:19 ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-05-03 12:22 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2009-05-05 8:22 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0905030821290.7144@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®