mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __setup_param(), unique_id and vdso_setup
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:46:49 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0905090635530.14376@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090509073227.GA22397@uranus.ravnborg.org>


  regarding the sole remaining invocation of __setup_param() in the
entire tree that could possibly be removed, taking the definition of
__setup_param() with it:

On Sat, 9 May 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 03:24:21PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > ...
> > =====
> >
> >   in short, both invocations of __setup_param() use identical second
> > and third parameters, and a tree-wide grep shows:
> >
> > $ grep -rw __setup_param *
> > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c:__setup_param("vdso=", vdso32_setup, vdso_setup, 0);
> > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn, early)                   \
> > include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 0)
> > include/linux/init.h:   __setup_param(str, fn, fn, 1)
> > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn)  /* nothing */
> > $
> >
> >   so apart from that single exception involving "vdso", that macro
> > could be simplified to just get rid of that third parameter.  is
> > there something special about the vdso boot-time parm that
> > *requires* it to be the only boot-time parm in the entire kernel
> > to have a different unique id?  just curious.  or does that have
> > to be preserved for out-of-tree builds?

> No - so please go ahead and clean it up.

  i'd be happy to, except i'm not sure how to resolve that last
invocation to no longer use __setup_param().  from
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c:

=====
...
unsigned int __read_mostly vdso_enabled = VDSO_DEFAULT;

static int __init vdso_setup(char *s)
{
        vdso_enabled = simple_strtoul(s, NULL, 0);

        return 1;
}

/*
 * For consistency, the argument vdso32=[012] affects the 32-bit vDSO
 * behavior on both 64-bit and 32-bit kernels.
 * On 32-bit kernels, vdso=[012] means the same thing.
 */
__setup("vdso32=", vdso_setup);

#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
__setup_param("vdso=", vdso32_setup, vdso_setup, 0);

EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vdso_enabled);
#endif
...
=====

  if someone wants to resolve that file to remove the use of
__setup_param(), this cleanup should be done in two steps, anyway.
first, get rid of that final invocation, followed by removing the
definition from moduleparam.h.  suggestions?

rday

p.s.  there are only three architectures that appear to support a
boot-time parm of vdso (or some equivalent):

$ grep -rw __setup * | grep vdso
arch/sh/kernel/vsyscall/vsyscall.c:__setup("vdso=", vdso_setup);
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c:__setup("vdso32=", vdso_setup);
arch/x86/vdso/vma.c:__setup("vdso=", vdso_setup);
arch/s390/kernel/vdso.c:__setup("vdso=", vdso_setup);
$

  that doesn't quite match with what one finds in
Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt:

        vdso=           [X86,SH]
                        vdso=2: enable compat VDSO (default with COMPAT_VDSO)
                        vdso=1: enable VDSO (default)
                        vdso=0: disable VDSO mapping

        vdso32=         [X86]
                        vdso32=2: enable compat VDSO (default with COMPAT_VDSO)
                        vdso32=1: enable 32-bit VDSO (default)
                        vdso32=0: disable 32-bit VDSO mapping

just an observation.
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:                             http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

      reply	other threads:[~2009-05-09 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-06 19:24 Robert P. J. Day
2009-05-09  7:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-05-09 10:46   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0905090635530.14376@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®