From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756334AbZEVOKf (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2009 10:10:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755203AbZEVOK2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2009 10:10:28 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:52951 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753051AbZEVOK2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2009 10:10:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:08:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Stanislaw Gruszka cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH resend4 1/3] itimers: merge ITIMER_VIRT and ITIMER_PROF common code In-Reply-To: <20090522154331.3e6f5ca3@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20090522154331.3e6f5ca3@dhcp-lab-109.englab.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stanislaw, On Fri, 22 May 2009, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > --- a/kernel/fork.c > +++ b/kernel/fork.c > @@ -790,10 +790,10 @@ static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig) > thread_group_cputime_init(sig); > > /* Expiration times and increments. */ > - sig->it_virt_expires = cputime_zero; > - sig->it_virt_incr = cputime_zero; > - sig->it_prof_expires = cputime_zero; > - sig->it_prof_incr = cputime_zero; > + sig->it[0].expires = cputime_zero; > + sig->it[0].incr = cputime_zero; > + sig->it[1].expires = cputime_zero; > + sig->it[1].incr = cputime_zero; Nit, can we please use CPUCLOCK_PROF/VIRT instead of 0/1 ? Thanks, tglx