mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:17:52 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0906051616001.5200@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090605201001.GA17085@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Russell King wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:16:49PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 01:53:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 05:57:56PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > > fix the following 'make headers_check' warning:
> > >
> > > I think headers_check needs fixing - there's nothing wrong with the
> > > code as it presently stands except the tools obviously can't properly
> > > parse C preprocessor statements.
> >
> > You are correct that headers_ceck is limited here and this patch
> > take some valid code and refactor it to make it headers_check compatible.
>
> If it is just a matter of unifdef not doing the right thing, then
> that's a bug in unifdef - looking at the code, it _should_ handle
> the case as it's currently in the tree.

  the current version of unifdef, as it stands, has some weaknesses.
there's a newer version -- sunifdef -- that appears to be more robust
and ruthless when it comes to cleaning.  just an observation.

http://www.sunifdef.strudl.org/

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In:                             http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-05 20:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-04 12:23 [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:29   ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:31     ` [PATCH 3/6] headers_check fix: m68k, swab.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:35       ` [PATCH 4/6] headers_check fix: mips, ioctl.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:37         ` [PATCH 5/6] headers_check fix: mn10300, ptrace.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:38           ` [PATCH 6/6] headers_check fix: mn10300, setup.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:46         ` [PATCH 4/6] headers_check fix: mips, ioctl.h Ralf Baechle
2009-06-04 20:09           ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05  9:34             ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-05 12:04               ` Ralf Baechle
2009-06-04 20:22     ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-08 16:33       ` Luck, Tony
2009-06-08 17:48         ` [PATCH] ia64: unexport fpswa.h Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05  9:26     ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-04 12:53   ` [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h Russell King
2009-06-04 15:45     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 20:16     ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05 20:10       ` Russell King
2009-06-05 20:17         ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2009-06-05 20:48       ` Russell King
2009-06-05 21:24         ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06  8:50         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06  9:12           ` Russell King
2009-06-06  9:34             ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604 Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05  2:00   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06  8:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06  8:43   ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06  9:09     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 12:54 ` [GIT PULL] headers_check fixes Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 13:02   ` Russell King
2009-06-06 13:34     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 13:41       ` Russell King
2009-06-06 14:39     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 21:47       ` Russell King
2009-06-06 21:51         ` Russell King
2009-06-06 22:12         ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06 23:24           ` Russell King
2009-06-07  7:09             ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-07  7:16         ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-07 10:15         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0906051616001.5200@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®