From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression with commit f9cde5f in 2.6.30-gitX
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:45:31 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0906242043230.2767@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624112849.55b38fff@jbarnes-g45>
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I was thinking 32 but 64 would be better if there aren't any
> > downsides elsewhere of making the array that big.
>
> Just chatting with Len about this; apparently the PNPACPI layer ran
> into something similar awhile back, and they had to go to a variable
> sized list of resources, due to weird machines with huge numbers of
> resources. Matthew says he's got an idea about how to fix this up; if
> that doesn't work out I'll see about making the bus resource array into
> a list instead.
Can we just bring the limit check back and increase the number for now
until folks come up with a better solution ?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 1:33 Larry Finger
2009-06-24 5:31 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 12:16 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 12:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 12:30 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 14:46 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 14:21 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 15:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 15:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-24 15:42 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 15:57 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:13 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-24 17:55 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 18:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-06-24 18:45 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-06-24 19:48 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 20:05 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 21:24 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 22:12 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 21:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 21:42 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 21:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 22:04 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 22:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 22:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-06-24 23:33 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 19:28 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:52 ` Larry Finger
2009-06-24 14:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-24 15:55 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-24 15:56 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:15 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-24 16:33 ` Gary Hade
2009-06-24 16:25 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0906242043230.2767@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®