From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754799AbZHPPAZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:00:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752746AbZHPPAY (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:00:24 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:59260 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752744AbZHPPAY (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:00:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:00:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Christoph Hellwig cc: LKML , Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch 00/11] Cleanup unload_nls() calls In-Reply-To: <20090816144657.GA9549@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <20090814122657.114987508@linutronix.de> <20090816144657.GA9549@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:42:36PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > While looking through the BKL call sites in fs/* I noticed that most > > callsites of unload_nls() do > > > > if (nls) > > unload_nls(nls); > > > > The patch series moves the NULL pointer check into unload_nls() and > > cleans up the various users. > > This looks all good to me. But I'd just make it a single patch.. Sure, should go via Al, right ? Thanks, tglx