mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 team <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] x86: add more platform_setup functions
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:31:42 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0908291923350.19335@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07556A5EA87A@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Pan, Jacob jun wrote:

> >From fbfe65d64e4dbb31940d31a59e080bfa15d121bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:51:42 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: RFC add more platform_setup functions
> 
> check_timer can be abstracted so that we don't have to do the complicated
> checks for platform timer for all platforms.

Well, if it's necessary then we replace it, but the code you showed in
an earlier patch is just adding debug cruft. So what's the point ?

> pci irq enable/disable can also
> benefit from the platform setup layer, but this part is not complete in this
> patch, should be able to include visws. e.g.

Please provide one patch per feature / change.
 
> pcibios_enable_irq = &pci_visws_enable_irq;
> pcibios_disable_irq = &pci_visws_disable_irq;

No, this is patently wrong. You abstract at the wrong point. If
abstraction of the pci init is necessary then the various #ifdeffed
function calls in legacy.c:pci_subsys_init() have to be platformized.
 
>  extern int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/platform.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/platform.h
> index 1cea28c..d698f68 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/platform.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/platform.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  struct mpc_bus;
>  struct mpc_cpu;
>  struct mpc_table;
> +struct pci_dev;
>  
>  /**
>   * struct platform_setup_quirks - platform specific quirks
> @@ -62,6 +63,11 @@ struct platform_setup_irqs {
>  	void (*pre_vector_init)(void);
>  	void (*intr_init)(void);
>  	void (*trap_init)(void);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> +	int (*pci_enable_irq)(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +	void (*pci_disable_irq)(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +#endif

PCI stuff does not belong to irq. It needs a separate data
structure. Also using the function pointers just to assign them later
to some other function pointer is pointless. The code can be
restructured so you can just tweak the existing function pointer.
Also I avoided #ifdefs in the platform code on purpose. The few bytes
you spare in the init structure are not worth the #ifdef mess which is
needed all over the place.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-29 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-21 21:29 [RFC patch 00/32] x86: Refactor the setup code to provide a base for embedded platforms Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 01/32] x86: Add platform_setup infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 02/32] x86: Add probe_roms to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:23   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-21 22:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] x86/boot: Moorestown patch set based on platform_set abstraction Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 16:59         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] x86: introduce a set of platform feature flags Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] x86: add moorestown specific platform setup code Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 17:20         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] x86/apbt: Moorestown APB system timer driver Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/apic: decouple legacy irq handling in ioapic Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] x86/apic: Early setup IOAPIC for APB timer Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] x86: add more platform_setup functions Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 17:31         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 03/32] x86: Add request_standard_resources to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 04/32] x86: Add reserve_ebda_region " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 05/32] x86: Move memory_setup to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 06/32] x86: Sanitize smp_record and move it to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 07/32] x86: Move ioapic_ids_setup " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 08/32] x86: Move mpc_apic_id " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 09/32] x86: Move smp_read_mpc_oem " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 10/32] x86: Move mpc_oem_pci_bus " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 11/32] x86: Move oem_bus_info " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 12/32] x86: Move get/find_smp_config " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 13/32] x86: Move pre_intr_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 14/32] x86: Move irq_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 15/32] x86: Move traps_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 16/32] x86: Replace ARCH_SETUP by a proper platform function Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:30   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-21 23:42     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/boot: adding hw subarch ID for Moorestown Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 16:58         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 17/32] x86: Move paravirt banner printout to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 18/32] x86: Move paravirt pagetable_setup " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 19/32] x86: Move xen_post_allocator_init into xen_pagetable_setup_done Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 20/32] x86: Move percpu clockevents setup to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 21/32] x86: Add timer_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-24  6:48   ` Andrey Panin
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 22/32] x86: Remove do_timer hook Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 23/32] x86: Prepare unification of time_32/64.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 24/32] x86: Simplify timer_ack magic in time_32.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 25/32] x86: Remove mca bus ifdef from timer interrupt Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 26/32] x86: Make timer setup and global variables the same in time_32/64.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 27/32] x86: Move calibrate_cpu to tsc.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 28/32] x86: time_32/64.c unify profile_pc Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 29/32] x86: Replace the now identical time_32/64.c by time.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 30/32] x86: Move tsc_calibration to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 31/32] init: Move sched_clock_init after late_time_init Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 32/32] x86: Move tsc_init to late_time_init Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:19 ` [RFC patch 00/32] x86: Refactor the setup code to provide a base for embedded platforms Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-22 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-23  9:15   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0908291923350.19335@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®