mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@gmail.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup sched_yield (sys)call nesting.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:36:42 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191122210.24119@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258606116.25022.57.camel@sven.thebigcorporation.com>

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich wrote:
> We are trying to get rid of __sched_yield calls from-inside-the-Kernel,
> but sys_sched_yield() from user-space will remain.
> 
> This patch breaks out the in-Kernel interface for the yield()
> functionality and deprecates it explicitly.
> 
> The sys_sched_yield() variety, however is not deprecated.
> 
> The objective is to deprecate *only* the in-kernel calls to
> sched_yield(), in hopes of reducing new calls to sched_yield() being
> added.

Nothing in the kernel calls sched_yield() because there is no such
function.

> Eventually, when the in-Kernel calls are gone, the __sched_yield() would
> be removed, and the first 2 hunks would essentially be reverted, leaving
> only the user-space caller sys_sched_yield. 
> 
> For the time being we add 2 lines and 2 braces of bulk, in hopes that
> elsewhere this eliminates more __sched_yield() calls being added while
> we work to eliminate the ones that exist already.

Err ? WTF do you need to fiddle in sched.c to deprecate a function ?

Nothing in the kernel calls sys_sched_yield() except the syscall and
the implementation of yield() in sched.c. The drivers,... call yield()
nothing else.

To deprecate yield() all you need is adding __deprecated to the
function prototype in sched.h. And that's the only way you alert users
because it warns when compiling code which _calls_ yield() not when
compiling the implementation in sched.c.

Sigh,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-19 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <c384c5ea0911071101u7415d37o2611c542e5fae309@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20091107210147.3e754278@hyperion.delvare>
     [not found]   ` <4AF7148C.9090706@thebigcorporation.com>
     [not found]     ` <20091112211255.09cd884a@hyperion.delvare>
2009-11-13 22:03       ` yield() in i2c non-happy paths hits BUG under -rt patch Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-14 18:02         ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-16 15:56         ` Mark Brown
2009-11-18  0:50           ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-11-18  1:05             ` Alan Cox
2009-11-18 16:28               ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-11-18 16:52                 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-18 20:36                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 12:05                     ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-19 12:59                       ` Alan Cox
2009-11-19 13:06                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 14:00                           ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-19 14:15                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 13:11                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 13:21                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 13:22                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 13:18                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-18 20:46                   ` [PATCH] cleanup sched_yield (sys)call nesting Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-11-18 20:56                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-18 21:04                       ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-11-18 21:34                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19  4:48                           ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-11-19 10:36                             ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-11-19  3:20                     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0911191122210.24119@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=leon.woestenberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sven@thebigcorporation.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®