From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762005AbZLKAdu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:33:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761999AbZLKAdt (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:33:49 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40762 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757364AbZLKAds (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:33:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:32:56 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=F6m=22?= cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [git pull] drm In-Reply-To: <4B219046.3080908@pathscale.com> Message-ID: References: <1260459601.18520.26.camel@skunk> <6d4bc9fc0912100940l1d2954d0k187ae54bf44a23f5@mail.gmail.com> <6a89f9d50912101153l2b58b07fudf6965b2f5172f7f@mail.gmail.com> <20091210235835.20e2269d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4B219046.3080908@pathscale.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, "C. Bergström" wrote: > > Thanks for the rather lengthly explanation, but in case you missed what people > are trying to say here.. > > With all due respect Linus.. > > "patches welcome" The problem is that I have never even heard a Red Hat or Fedora person actually acknoledge that yes, they should be trying to upstream it. Have Red Hat and Fedora just decided that "upstream first" simply doesn't matter any more? Because quite frankly, that was kind of the feeling I came away with from the Kernel summit. It's like they _want_ to keep it internal. Linus