From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Russ Dill <russ.dill@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 2.6.33-git
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:36:36 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912142031170.14385@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260849652.28808.1.camel@russ-laptop>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Russ Dill wrote:
> @@ -144,10 +144,9 @@ static int __find_interface(struct device *dev, void *data)
> return 0;
>
> intf = to_usb_interface(dev);
> - if (intf->minor != -1 && intf->minor == arg->minor) {
> - arg->interface = intf;
> + if (intf->minor != -1 && intf->minor == arg->minor &&
> + dev->driver == arg->drv)
> return 1;
> - }
> return 0;
> }
Btw, can we please write this somewhat more readably, and just do
if (dev->driver != arg->drv)
return 0;
intf = to_usb_interface(dev);
return intf->minor == arg->minor;
because the whole "intf->minor != -1" thing is pointless (we're going to
test it against 'arg->minor', and if that is -1, then the caller damn well
gets what he deserves anyway).
This way there are no complex multi-line crud expressions, and it all
looks simpler. No?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 21:26 Greg KH
2009-12-12 6:59 ` [build failure] " Ingo Molnar
2009-12-12 7:00 ` David Miller
2009-12-12 7:15 ` [PATCH] kaweth: Replace runtime power management primitives Ingo Molnar
2009-12-15 0:39 ` [GIT PATCH] USB patches for 2.6.33-git Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 0:52 ` Greg KH
2009-12-15 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 1:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 2:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 3:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 3:17 ` russ.dill
2009-12-15 4:00 ` Russ Dill
2009-12-15 4:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 4:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 14:31 ` Greg KH
2009-12-15 4:36 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-12-15 4:45 ` Russ Dill
2009-12-15 6:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-15 6:11 ` Russ Dill
2009-12-15 6:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-02 23:09 Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0912142031170.14385@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=russ.dill@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®