From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clockevent: don't remove broadcast device when cpu is dead
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:52:38 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001141248510.6420@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4F0376.3090906@redhat.com>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> On 01/14/2010 06:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> > > On 01/12/2010 09:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Marc reported BUG during shutdown, after debugging, kernel is trying
> > > > > to remove a broadcast device which mode is CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT.
> > > > >
> > > > > The root cause for this bug is that in clockevents_notify,
> > > > > "cpumask_weight(dev->cpumask) == 1" is always true even if dev is a
> > > >
> > > > Why is cpumask_weight(dev->cpumask) == 1 always true when we shutdown
> > > > a non boot cpu ?
> > > >
> > > > The broadcast device is not a per cpu device and the cpumask should
> > > > not only contain the CPU which is shut down !
> > >
> > > At least for hpet broadcast dev, it's dev->cpumask is only contain the CPU
> > > which it is initialized from.
> >
> > Which is fundamentaly wrong and the root cause of the problem. I'll
> > have a look tomorrow morning when my brain is more awake than now.
>
> hpet_legacy_clockevent_register is trying to register new CE, but replace
> failed,
> then in tick_check_new_device -> tick_check_broadcast_device, the legacy hpet
> CE
> was registered as multicast device, but its dev->cpumask is cpumask of
> smp_processor_id().
>
> on my system its dev->cpumask is cpumask of 0, but in Marc's, dev->cpumask is
> cpumask of 4.
> So when kernel is trying to offline cpu 4, the broadcast hpet is removed.
I know, but the point is that a broadcast device should not be bound
to the CPU which is registering it. Working on a fix.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-14 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-07 3:22 Xiaotian Feng
2010-01-12 2:24 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-01-12 13:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-13 1:28 ` Marc Dionne
2010-01-13 1:48 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-01-13 22:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-14 11:43 ` Xiaotian Feng
2010-01-14 11:52 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2010-01-18 13:48 ` [tip:timers/urgent] clockevent: Don't " tip-bot for Xiaotian Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1001141248510.6420@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=damm@igel.co.jp \
--cc=dfeng@redhat.com \
--cc=hsweeten@visionengravers.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®