mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] time: add wait_interruptible_timeout macro to sleep (w. timeout) until wake_up
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:04:19 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002261701230.4513@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b170af451002260238p29c7db97nd50154bf7288ef42@mail.gmail.com>



On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> Following macro is soemthing that seems to work fine for us, but instead
> introducing this to radeon KMS only, I'd like to propose adding this to whole
> wait.h. Do you this it's something we should place there? Can someone take this
> patch for me? Or maybe you find this rather useless and we should keep this
> marco locally?

This does not smell generic to me. In fact, it makes me personally think 
you're doing something wrong in the first place, but maybe it's ok. But in 
case it really is ok, I'd still not put it in a generic header file unless 
you can point to other cases where it really makes sense to do this.

		Linus

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-27  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-21 14:10 Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-21 15:01 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2010-02-21 15:50   ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-24 22:33     ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-26 10:38 ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-26 11:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-02-26 12:16     ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-26 16:14   ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-26 17:33     ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-26 19:01       ` Ville Syrjälä
2010-02-27  9:33         ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-03-01 16:37           ` Michel Dänzer
2010-03-02 20:32             ` Rafał Miłecki
2010-02-27  1:04   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1002261701230.4513@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®