From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754038Ab0CBXG3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:06:29 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:48750 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751787Ab0CBXG1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:06:27 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:06:17 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Dave Airlie cc: dri-devel@lists.sf.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Dave Airlie wrote: > > because it does nothing on anything except the laptops in question and on > those it does nothing except add a control file in debugfs? It's still code. And if the user didn't ask for it, it should damn well not be there. > So how am I supposed to indicate to distro vendors that something should > be turned on? If you think that distro kernel maintainers really > understand every config option that goes past, I've got a bridge. User configurations is _not_ your job. Your job is to make sure that the kernel works, and people who don't ask for new feaures don't get them. Linus