mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.sf.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm request 2
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:40:59 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003021536280.3616@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21d7e9971003021527t41268786q302a218ffe410763@mail.gmail.com>



On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Did I mention that driver is in STAGING?

Staging is for _improving_ the quality of the drivers, not for making it 
worse.

We still very much have quality standards. The staging tree is for things 
to get in that don't quite _reach_ the standards we expect, but it's not a 
blanket excuse for not testing things.

And yes, I expect that stuff can be a bit rough during the merge window, 
after all, the whole point is that we can fix things up. But quite 
frankly, if _I_ find problems on the few machines I personally build and 
test on, then what does that say about the bigger picture?

IOW, I refuse to pull code that doesn't even work for me. If I did, where 
would we end up? What do you think should be my minimal quality 
requirements, if "Oh, it doesn't even build for me" is too much to ask 
for?

So if I find code that doesn't work, I'm not going to just say "whatever". 
I'm going to reject it.

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-02 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-01 23:46 Dave Airlie
2010-03-02 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-02 23:02   ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-02 23:06     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-02 23:09       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-03 11:12     ` Thomas Backlund
2010-03-02 23:03   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-02 23:16     ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-02 23:27       ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-02 23:40         ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-03-02 23:48           ` Dave Airlie
2010-03-03  0:34             ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1003021536280.3616@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome