From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752877Ab0CFTuq (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:50:46 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:38677 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751421Ab0CFTuo (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:50:44 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 11:50:37 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Bjorn Helgaas cc: Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adam Belay Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] resource, PNPACPI: add bus number and window support In-Reply-To: <20100305174656.21946.93874.stgit@bob.kio> Message-ID: References: <20100305174656.21946.93874.stgit@bob.kio> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have nothing against this patch-series, but I'm not really much of a pnp person, so I'd like to see this at a minimum being acked by people who are, and who would use this. In fact, since the primary _reason_ for this seems to be to improve on the _CRS parsing code for PCI, I'd have expected that the people involved with previous _CRS issues be involved, and perhaps this whole thing could go through the PCI tree? But Yinghai Lu and Jesse Barnes weren't even cc'd. But maybe this really is more of an ACPI issue. I dunno. I get the feeling that ACPI doesn't really care, though - the subsystem that actually gets _affected_ by all this in the end is PCI. Anyway, more acks, please. And preferably involve the PCI people too. Linus