From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754959Ab0CGVhI (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:37:08 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:38381 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753131Ab0CGVhG (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Mar 2010 16:37:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:36:26 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: James Morris cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin Subject: Re: Upstream first policy In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > My point was just that there's a lot of mindless "my way or the > highway" in some security circles, and apparmor really has been > ridiculed. .. and perhaps more fundamentally, the deeper point was that that in no way stops the "upstream first" policy. Some Ubuntu people who wanted to get it merged were in fact worried that it might. Linus