From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932624Ab0CNSJf (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:09:35 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46843 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754946Ab0CNSJe (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:09:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Wolfram Sang cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jiri Kosina , Larry Finger , WANG Cong , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] base firmware: Fix BUG from sysfs attributes change in commit a2db6842873c8e5a70652f278d469128cb52db70 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4b9be956.x5+yAHXGDfXer810%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/85212/ > > (which is pretty much the same like the patch originating this thread. I vote > > very much for dropping those patches and use > > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/84814/ instead!) > > Also, that "firmware_attr_data" thing should probably be marked 'const', > no? That should make it more obvious that it's ok to share across multiple > different firmware file, I think. Btw, if it wasn't obvious, this was a comment on that http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/84814/ patch that would replace the one-liner in 85212. Linus