mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kgdb fixes for 2.6.34-rc2
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:04:22 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004010857060.3707@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB0B2AB.2060207@windriver.com>



On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
> Ping.
> 
> Linus, please help me understand how we can continue to move forward on
> the kernel debugger pull requests.  There have been numerous requests
> that have not been pulled and have no response as to what needs to be
> acted on to resolve any outstanding issues.

I've been swamped and bad, and since I wrote another email to explain why 
I'm always so grumpy (unrelated thread, nothing to do with kgdb), I'll 
cut-and-paste some of the relevant explanation for my pulling (or not 
pulling, as in this case) here too..

--> begin cut-and-pastee <--
  
  Even on the merging side, what ends up happening is that some trees I 
  decide I can't afford to merge, simply because the potential pain of 
  merging without knowing the code is too high. So I can merge a new 
  filesystem without any issues - if it's buggy, all I need to know is "new 
  filesystem craps out". But when it comes to core generic code that anybody 
  can hit, I have to _rely_ on submaintainers doing the right thing.
  
  And when that doesn't work out, and stuff falls through the cracks, I'm 
  kind of screwed. And this looked like a "fall through the cracks" thing.
  
  [ I skipped the kdb merge this window, for example, and I feel bad about 
    that, and will have to walk over the pull request with a comb once the 
    merge window fallout calms down, so that I can do it the next merge 
    window. Not because I need to understand each line, but because I 
    need to understand what the potential bigger-picture impacts are when 
    something that looks odd pops up ]
  
--> end cut-and-paste <--

and obviously one of the issues is that I end up always prioritizing my 
pulls etc, and because I'm not a huge fan of debuggers (understatement of 
the year), that pull request was always at the bottom of the pile. And 
this merge window I ended up having some Intel event things that took up a 
good chunk of the window, so I never did get to that bottom.

Usually things calm down for me at around -rc4, when it turns into a 
waiting game instead of fighting fires. So I'm expecting to do that "look 
things over" this weekend or next week. 

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-01 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-22 19:17 Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] Move kernel/kgdb.c to kernel/debug/debug_core.c Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17   ` [PATCH 2/8] Separate the gdbstub from the debug core Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17     ` [PATCH 3/8] kgdb: eliminate kgdb_wait(), all cpus enter the same way Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17       ` [PATCH 4/8] kgdb: have ebin2mem call probe_kernel_write once Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17         ` [PATCH 5/8] kgdb,debug_core: Use atomic operators which use barriers Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17           ` [PATCH 6/8] kgdbts,sh: Add in breakpoint pc offset for superh Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17             ` [PATCH 7/8] debug_core: Turn off tracing while in the debugger Jason Wessel
2010-03-22 19:17               ` [PATCH 8/8] MAINTAINERS: update kgdb, and debug_core info Jason Wessel
2010-03-29 14:01 ` [GIT PULL] kgdb fixes for 2.6.34-rc2 Jason Wessel
2010-04-01 16:04   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-04-02 18:38     ` Jason Wessel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1004010857060.3707@i5.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome