From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932426Ab0EFU0Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 16:26:25 -0400 Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.11]:58805 "EHLO vms173011pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757810Ab0EFU0Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 16:26:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 16:26:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Len Brown X-X-Sender: lenb@localhost.localdomain To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for May 6 (acpi: PM=n) In-reply-to: <20100506080538.b566f50e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Message-id: References: <20100506151502.f97afe54.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100506080538.b566f50e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > When CONFIG_PM is not set: > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `acpi_init': > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d84): undefined reference to `pm_flags' > bus.c:(.init.text+0x2d91): undefined reference to `pm_flags' CONFIG_ACPI depends on CONFIG_PM, so acpi/bus.c should not be compiled for CONFIG_PM=n Hmm, is is somebody doing something strange, like "select ACPI" without guaranteeing that all of ACPI's dependencies are satisfied? thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center