mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"Peter W. Morreale" <pmorreale@novell.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@novell.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	John Cooper <john.cooper@third-harmonic.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] futex: Add FUTEX_LOCK with optional adaptive spinning
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 18:20:41 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005071818380.3401@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273127060-30375-5-git-send-email-dvhltc@us.ibm.com>

On Wed, 5 May 2010, Darren Hart wrote:

> Add a non-pi TID value based futex locking mechanism. This enables the
> use of adaptive spinning which was problematic with the basic FUTEX_WAIT
> operation.

You still do way too much work in that spin code with way too much
code lines.

Can you try the following (completely uncompiled/untested) patch ?

Thanks,

	tglx
Subject: futex-simplify.patch
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 17:56:38 +0200

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/futex.c |   42 ++++++++++++------------------------
 kernel/sched.c |   66 ---------------------------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/futex.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/futex.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2406,11 +2406,10 @@ out:
  *  1 - Futex lock acquired
  * <0 - On error
  */
-static int trylock_futex_adaptive(u32 __user *uaddr, ktime_t *timeout)
+static int trylock_futex_adaptive(u32 __user *uaddr, struct hrtimer_sleeper *to)
 {
 	struct thread_info *owner = NULL;
 	pid_t curtid, ownertid = 0;
-	ktime_t now;
 	int ret = 0;
 	u32 curval;
 
@@ -2425,43 +2424,32 @@ static int trylock_futex_adaptive(u32 __
 		/*
 		 * Try to acquire the lock.
 		 */
-		if (curval == 0)
+		if (curval == 0) {
 			curval = cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(uaddr, 0, curtid);
 
-		if (curval == 0) {
-			ret = 1;
-			break;
-		}
+			if (curval == 0) {
+				ret = 1;
+				break;
+			}
 
-		if (unlikely(curval == -EFAULT)) {
-			ret = -EFAULT;
-			break;
+			if (unlikely(curval == -EFAULT)) {
+				ret = -EFAULT;
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * Futex locks manage the owner atomically. We are not in
-		 * danger of deadlock by preempting a pending owner. Abort the
-		 * loop if our time slice has expired.  RT Threads can spin
-		 * until they preempt the owner, at which point they will break
-		 * out of the loop anyway.
-		 */
-		if (need_resched())
+		if (to && !to->task) {
+			ret = -ETIMEOUT;
 			break;
-
-		if (timeout) {
-			now = ktime_get();
-			if (timeout->tv64 < now.tv64)
-				break;
 		}
 
-		cpu_relax();
-
 		if ((curval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) != ownertid) {
 			if (owner)
 				put_task_struct(owner->task);
 			owner = futex_owner(uaddr);
 		}
-		if (owner && !futex_spin_on_owner(uaddr, owner))
+
+		if (!owner->oncpu)
 			break;
 	}
 
@@ -2510,9 +2498,7 @@ static int futex_lock(u32 __user *uaddr,
 retry:
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (flags & FLAGS_ADAPTIVE) {
-		preempt_disable();
 		ret = trylock_futex_adaptive(uaddr, time);
-		preempt_enable();
 
 		/* We got the lock. */
 		if (ret == 1) {
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3821,72 +3821,6 @@ out:
 }
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
-#include <linux/futex.h>
-
-int futex_spin_on_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct thread_info *owner)
-{
-	u32 ownertid, uval;
-	unsigned int cpu;
-	struct rq *rq;
-
-	if (!sched_feat(OWNER_SPIN))
-		return 0;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
-	/*
-	 * Need to access the cpu field knowing that
-	 * DEBUG_PAGEALLOC could have unmapped it if
-	 * the mutex owner just released it and exited.
-	 */
-	if (probe_kernel_address(&owner->cpu, cpu))
-		goto out;
-#else
-	cpu = owner->cpu;
-#endif
-
-	/*
-	 * Even if the access succeeded (likely case),
-	 * the cpu field may no longer be valid.
-	 */
-	if (cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
-		goto out;
-
-	/*
-	 * We need to validate that we can do a
-	 * get_cpu() and that we have the percpu area.
-	 */
-	if (!cpu_online(cpu))
-		goto out;
-
-	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
-
-	if (get_user(ownertid, uaddr))
-		return -EFAULT;
-	ownertid &= FUTEX_TID_MASK;
-
-	for (;;) {
-		/*
-		 * Owner changed, break to re-assess state.
-		 */
-		if (get_user(uval, uaddr))
-			return -EFAULT;
-		if ((uval & FUTEX_TID_MASK) != ownertid)
-			break;
-
-		/*
-		 * Is that owner really running on that cpu?
-		 */
-		if (task_thread_info(rq->curr) != owner || need_resched())
-			return 0;
-
-		cpu_relax();
-	}
-out:
-	return 1;
-}
-#endif
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
 /*
  * this is the entry point to schedule() from in-kernel preemption

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-07 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-06  6:24 [PATCH V6 0/4][RFC] futex: " Darren Hart
2010-05-06  6:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] futex: replace fshared and clockrt with combined flags Darren Hart
2010-05-06  6:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] futex: add futex_q static initializer Darren Hart
2010-05-06  6:24 ` [PATCH 3/4] futex: refactor futex_lock_pi_atomic Darren Hart
2010-05-06  6:24 ` [PATCH 4/4] futex: Add FUTEX_LOCK with optional adaptive spinning Darren Hart
2010-05-07 16:20   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2010-05-07 16:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-07 16:30       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-07 16:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-07 16:43           ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-07 19:05             ` Darren Hart
2010-05-07 16:52     ` Darren Hart
2010-05-07 19:11     ` Darren Hart
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-09  5:15 [PATCH V5 0/4][RFC] futex: " dvhltc
2010-04-09  5:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] futex: Add " dvhltc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1005071818380.3401@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=drepper@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=john.cooper@third-harmonic.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmorreale@novell.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sdietrich@novell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®