mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Subject: Re: [git pull] Input updates for 2.6.34-rc6
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 09:58:27 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005130955240.3711@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005130943460.3711@i5.linux-foundation.org>



On Thu, 13 May 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> PnP information _commonly_ doesn't inclure PS/2 ports, even when they 
> exist. Lack of PnP information about the keyboard port means absolutely 
> nothing, and anybody who tells you otherwise is totally and utterly wrong. 
> 
> So don't confuse this with PnP issues. That's a total red herring, and 
> Apple is _not_at_all_ "doing the proper thing in the BIOS". 

Btw, was this an EFI boot?

I could easily see bootcamp working (it's been tested with Windows, after 
all), but not EFI (I've heard rumors of Windows booting from EFI, but I 
don't know if those are actually correct). 

And I'd be a _lot_ more open to saying "if you booted from EFI, then we're 
going to ignore any legacy devices that aren't in PnP tables".

In fact, we effectively do that today by having different code-paths for 
ia64 (which was EFI) and x86 (which is obviously traditionally not EFI).

			Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-13 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-13  7:57 Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-13 14:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-13 14:47   ` Bastien Nocera
2010-05-13 15:04     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-13 15:19       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-13 15:50       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-13 16:16         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-13 16:38           ` Randy Dunlap
2010-05-13 20:15         ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-13 16:01   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-13 16:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-13 16:58       ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-05-13 17:16       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-13 17:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-13 18:10           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-13 19:55             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-14  7:56               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-05-14 14:54                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-14 15:38                   ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-14 15:42                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-14 15:49                       ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-20  4:53                         ` Len Brown
     [not found]             ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005131232350.3711@i5.linux-foundation.org>
2010-05-13 21:05               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-13 21:21                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-13 23:39                 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-20  4:56                 ` Len Brown
2010-05-20  7:08                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-27  6:22       ` Robert Hancock
2010-05-27  6:43         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-27 17:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27 23:03           ` Robert Hancock
2010-05-28  0:46             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-28  1:03               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-28  4:05                 ` Robert Hancock
2010-05-28  5:10                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-14 14:55   ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-14 15:16     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-14 16:28       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-14 18:47       ` david
2010-05-14 18:49         ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-14 18:55           ` david
2010-05-14 18:59             ` Matthew Garrett
2010-05-14 19:05             ` david
2010-05-28  2:38       ` Mike Frysinger
2010-08-04  6:20       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-08-04  6:29         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-14 16:29     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2010-05-14 16:35       ` Matthew Garrett
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-05  6:41 Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1005130955240.3711@i5.linux-foundation.org \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hadess@hadess.net \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®