From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756206Ab0EROeL (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 10:34:11 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:32961 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751096Ab0EROeF (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 10:34:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 07:30:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ingo Molnar cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] core/locking changes for v2.6.35 In-Reply-To: <20100517212848.GA28536@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20100517212848.GA28536@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 May 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Tony Breeds (1): > mutex: Fix optimistic spinning vs. BKL Grr. This has the ugly timeout thing, but what's _really_ ugly about it is kernel/mutex.c: In function ¡__mutex_lock_common¢: kernel/mutex.c:148: warning: unused variable ¡timeout¢ Nasty. It happens when spinning is disabled due to lockdep or whatever debugging that kills it. Linus