From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Nikita V. Youshchenko" <yoush@cs.msu.su>
Cc: Sujit K M <sjt.kar@gmail.com>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT (2.6.33-rt17) disabled printk-to-console after console_init
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:23:07 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1005201317490.3368@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005201512.40304@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su>
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > > Still questions:
> > >
> > > 1) why does that prevent klogd from working?
> >
> > Patch below.
> > ...
> > @@ -1084,18 +1084,8 @@ void release_console_mutex(void)
> > #endif
> > }
> > console_locked = 0;
> > - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
> > mutex_unlock(&console_mutex);
>
> Hmm... that lock is taken inside loop body, then control goes out of loop
> at 'break' statement, and then, if this line is deteled, lock is still
> held at function return. Looks wrong.
Stupid me. Yes. Drop that line.
> > > 3) I believe that 8250 serial driver is aware of preempt-rt.
> > > Could you please comment on my "2.6.33.2-rt13: RFC: fix serial
> > > console" post to linux-rt-users list
> > > (http://eeek.borgchat.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg05569.html)
> >
> > While that can work due to the trylock, it can introduce massive
> > latencies just in case some driver reports a status change or what
> > ever.
>
> Isn't it better just manually disable console (with 'quiet' kernel command
> line option) when running in production? This may be recommended in proper
> guidelines.
No, anything which needs extra parameters for normal operation is
wrong as it affects users.
Adding a "I'm debugging, I don't care" flag for developers is the
right thing to do.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-20 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-18 13:13 Xianghua Xiao
2010-05-18 19:28 ` Xianghua Xiao
2010-05-18 19:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-18 20:49 ` Xianghua Xiao
2010-05-20 8:33 ` Nikita V. Youshchenko
2010-05-20 9:25 ` Sujit K M
2010-05-20 9:32 ` Sujit K M
2010-05-20 9:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-20 10:23 ` Nikita V. Youshchenko
2010-05-20 10:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-05-20 11:12 ` Nikita V. Youshchenko
2010-05-20 11:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2010-05-20 11:40 ` Nikita V. Youshchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1005201317490.3368@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sjt.kar@gmail.com \
--cc=yoush@cs.msu.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®