From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932972Ab0EYPR5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 11:17:57 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:45112 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757090Ab0EYPR4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 11:17:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Pekka Enberg cc: Nick Piggin , Christoph Lameter , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Zhang Yanmin , Matthew Wilcox , Matt Mackall , Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [RFC V2 SLEB 00/14] The Enhanced(hopefully) Slab Allocator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100524070309.GU2516@laptop> <20100525020629.GA5087@laptop> <20100525070734.GC5087@laptop> <20100525081634.GE5087@laptop> <20100525093410.GH5087@laptop> <20100525101924.GJ5087@laptop> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 May 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > I would have liked to see SLQB merged as well but it just didn't happen. And it's not going to. I'm not going to merge YASA that will stay around for years, not improve on anything, and will just mean that there are some bugs that developers don't see because they depend on some subtle interaction with the sl*b allocator. We've got three. That's at least one too many. We're not adding any new ones until we've gotten rid of at least one old one. Linus