From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932182Ab0FAP7l (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:59:41 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:49909 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932118Ab0FAP7j (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:59:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 08:55:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Randy Dunlap cc: Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "arjan@infradead.org" , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/timers/hpet_example.c: only build on X64 In-Reply-To: <4C0470BE.6040709@oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <20100528113514.GA3686@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <4C0470BE.6040709@oracle.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 31 May 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > We should only build hpet_example on X64, where it is > implemented. It can cause build errors on other arch-es. Both the subject and the body say "X64" (don't use that, btw, it's x86-64, please), but the patch itself says CONFIG_X86. So what is it? Is it any x86, is it just 64-bit, or what? So if it's any x86, then please say so in the explanation. And if it's really just x86-64, then use CONFIG_X86_64 as the config variable (and x86-64 rather than X64 in the commentary). Linus