From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM MSM updates for 2.6.35-rc1
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 14:27:06 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006021413100.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275511857.27006.6.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> Don't forget about this one! Or was something wrong with it?
I got a bit frustrated with ten different ARM pulls per day at one point.
There's something wrong with ARM development. The amount of pure noise in
the patches is incredibly annoying. Right now, ARM is already (despite me
not reacting to some of the flood) 55% of all arch/ changes since 2.6.34,
and it's all pointless churn in
arch/arm/configs/
arch/arm/mach-xyz
arch/arm/plat-blah
and at a certain point in the merge window I simply could not find it in
me to care about it any more.
Do you guys at all talk about this problem? Have any of the ARM people
bothered to look at the arch/arm diffs and see how mind-deadening they
are? I try to look through these kinds of things when I pull, but after a
million lines of pure noise, it gets old pretty quickly.
Somehow, I can't believe that you need thousands of lines for each random
arch/arm/mach-xyz (yeah, some very few of them are smaller).
For a taste of the mind-deadening experience, just do
for i in arch/arm/mach-*
do
echo $i; wc -l $(git ls-files $i)
done | less -S
and imagine being on the receiving side of that.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-02 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-27 21:52 Daniel Walker
2010-06-02 20:50 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-02 21:27 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-06-02 21:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 21:56 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-02 22:30 ` Daniel Walker
2010-06-02 23:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2010-06-03 1:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 3:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2010-06-03 4:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 16:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-06-04 5:34 ` Eric Miao
2010-06-03 4:45 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-03 5:36 ` Ben Dooks
2010-06-04 8:27 ` Vincent Sanders
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1006021413100.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome