From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932147Ab0FYVm3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:42:29 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:36489 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751895Ab0FYVm2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:42:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:42:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Chris Metcalf cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/tile: Enable more sophisticated IRQ model for 32-bit chips. In-Reply-To: <4C25206D.6070305@tilera.com> Message-ID: References: <201006252110.o5PLAovH010769@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <4C25206D.6070305@tilera.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 6/25/2010 5:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > [...] > > can you please cc me on irq related changes ? Also I'd prefer a combo > > patch of the irq code which lets me see the full story w/o going to > > pull another git tree from somewhere. > > Sure, I'll cc you going forward. > > What kind of combo patch did you have in mind? Do you just want copies > of the arch/tile files relevant to irqs? I've attached irq.h and irq.c > to this email; the rest (e.g. smp.c) is pretty minimal and probably best > viewed in the diff context anyway. > > I figured since the first round of tile-architecture changes has been > signed off on and is in linux-next, I should treat that as a baseline > when sending additional patches to LKML going forward. Maybe I'm > confused :-) No, _I_ did not notice that the base stuff is in -next already :) > Thanks in advance for your review and any patch-process clarification > you can offer. I have a look at the patches tomorrow when my brain is more awake. Thanks, tglx