From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] SysRq commands trigger without holding sysrq.
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 07:12:53 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006270710210.7802@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100614145659.GA2594@elliptictech.com>
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
>
> It appears that the new SysRq handling stuff totally ignores key
> releases: I don't have to hold down any of the keys to trigger sysrq
> commands. For example, if I press and release left-alt, then press and
> release print screen, then press b, the system reboots. The order in
> which I press the keys matters, but I can press other keys between them
> and still trigger sysrq commands (e.g. I can press and release alt, type
> a bunch, press print screen, then start triggering commands by pressing
> letters).
>
> The result is that it is very easy to accidentally trigger sysrq
> commands, to the detriment of a system's usefulness. It also renders
> the printscreen key completely useless after either alt key has been
> pressed once since system bootup (printscreen works fine until alt is
> pressed).
>
> Bisection reveals the following, and reverting the implicated commit
> (resolving a trivial conflict) solves the issue.
>
> 97f5f0cd8cd0a05449cbb77d1e6f02e026875802 is the first bad commit
Dmitry? I didn't see any follow-ups on this issue, should I just do the
revert, or is there some better fix?
There's another report about this from Éric Piel.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-27 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 14:56 Nick Bowler
2010-06-27 14:12 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-06-27 15:05 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1006270710210.7802@i5.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome