From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757346Ab0GNWAg (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:00:36 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:43025 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756953Ab0GNWAf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:00:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:00:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Joe Perches cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86 , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/cleanup.c: Use ";" not "," to terminate statements In-Reply-To: <1279142828.5816.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> Message-ID: References: <1279142828.5816.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Joe Perches wrote: Sorry, but that's one of the most convoluted changelogs I ever saw. > These are the only "," terminated statements that > precede a pr_ in the kernel tree. Errm, why is this related to pr_ in any way ? > These must be ";" terminated if the pr_ > macros becomes a bit more space efficient using > a "do { foo } while (0)" form. It has absolutely _NOTHING_ to do with any implementation detail of the function/macro which comes after those statements. Terminating a statement with a comma is simply wrong by itself and it needs to be fixed w/o further ado. Thanks, tglx