From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Posix CLOCK_RTC interface proof of concept
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:31:53 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1009181127090.2416@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100918061528.GA3249@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:42:38AM -0700, john stultz wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 12:59 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > That's basically a copy of enqueue_hrtimer(). Can't we use
> > > k_itimer.it.real for this and reuse the related functions in
> > > hrtimer.c? Not sure if it's worth the trouble though.
> >
> > Yes, there's also a similar duplication in drivers/char/mmtimer.c and
> > Richard Cochran commented on the same (although I'm not sure if he ended
> > up using the hrtimer for his similar PTP code).
>
> After taking a look at the hrtimer code, I decided to remove the timer
> implementation from the patch set. I do have the userland interface to
> timer_create/settime in place, but no clock drivers implement it yet.
>
> > I was hoping to find something I could re-use in the hrtimer code, but
> > it seemed a little tightly linked to the fixed CLOCK_MONOTONIC/REALTIME
> > bases.
>
> That was my impression, too. It looks like hrtimers are hard-coded to
> the clock event device via a global per-cpu variable. Would it be
> possible to decouple this for multiple, different clock event devices?
It needs some thought because the REALTIME/MONOTONIC implementation
needs to stay with the per cpu ness, but for RTC and others we need a
global queue. Though it shouldn't be too hard to solve that.
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-18 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-16 19:41 John Stultz
2010-09-17 7:52 ` Richard Cochran
2010-09-17 10:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-09-17 18:42 ` john stultz
2010-09-18 6:15 ` Richard Cochran
2010-09-18 9:31 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1009181127090.2416@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®